Great Controversies of the Bible: Myth, Fact, and Fallacy
One of the things, as a reviewer, that distracted me the most was his “* definitions.” I did not like having to look up terms in the back of the book numerous times. It distracted me from the author's thoughts. Ramia-Enriquez questions who wrote the Book and were their comments “real.” Who knows? We were not there. Yes, today in modern times we will all interpret the Book differently but does that mean we lose the basic concepts? I do think the author gave some good references, and scripture quotes, but again, it is his point of view. Maybe Ramia-Enriquez is dismayed with religion as a whole. I don’t think he gave readers an opportunity to address their own beliefs or opinions by encouraging them to do more research. His writing felt condescending and that he was right in entirety. “Great Controversies of the Bible” was a hard book to read due to terminology and the author’s very opinionated and personal views. |